From: chuck@chuckstr89134.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 8:06 AM
To: Webmaster
Subject: #028 Special Vista Edition
 

 

 

Hi Folks,

Here is the first “somewhat positive“ techie review I have seen of Vista.  I respect Chris Pirillo and have been reading and listening to him for over 10 years now.  He is highly respected in the world of Information Technology. - Chuck

Windows Vista Interview

The message with a subject line of “Press inquiry: Phone interview w/ German radio on Vista Launch“ hit my inbox late last night. I decided to respond in writing, if only to mentally prep myself for the impending phone call. Reinhard Roede wrote:

I’m preparing a short radio segment on the launch of Windows Vista, to be aired in our show called ‘Zuendfunk‘ on German public radio. And I’d like to ask you for a short radio interview on Vista and, especially, the public (blog) coverage of its development. In a bunch of websites and weblogs like yours, I’ve read many pieces of information about the beta stages of Longhorn / Vista in the last months and years - and now, I’ve got the impression that Windows Vista is the first major OS (version) ever to be developed under the watchful eyes of hundreds of techie webloggers worldwide.

Well, since America’s NPR isn’t dialing my number (or sending me emails), I’d be more than happy to seed my opinions to listeners in Germany.

How public geek-blog coverage might have changed the OS that is shipping now…

I’d say that general community feedback and communication has made a pretty solid impact on what the world will see in the shipping version of Windows Vista. Microsoft willfully opened the door to power users throughout the pre-release process. Certainly, there are hundreds of teams responsible for various parts of the platform - and some groups were more receptive to feedback than others. I know that a handful of my own suggestions actually made it into shipping code!

Which information sources and agents seem to have been meaningful in this development and which were not…

Well, I’ve been happy to pass feedback through Nick White and Aaron Coldiron - as well as Lili Cheng, Dave Vronay, and (in some cases) Jim Allchin. They were all aware that I held Windows Vista to a very high standard. Make no mistake: everybody who worked on the operating system, even the bits that will never see the light of day, has been meaningful in the process. Microsoft scores a perfect 100 in terms of community interaction and involvement, whereas Apple consistently scores a -4. In terms of external agents feeding the Microsoft machine, that would be just about anybody who got their hands on a publicly-available beta. Every bit of feedback, acknowledged or otherwise, I’m sure has been meaningful to Vista’s teams.

What did Microsoft like and dislike about (especially blog) coverage…

Good or bad, any kind of discussion is great. What you have to understand is that a lot of people who work at Microsoft aren’t outsiders to the blogosphere - they’re actually inside (and quite active) in the blogosphere. Certainly, Microsoft should be happy that external bloggers have written anything about Vista. If there’s something to dislike, it’s that more people aren’t talking about it in some way.

Oh, that’s easy: blogger reactions, mine included, have been raw. We don’t pull any punches with our passions. I see something that I feel needs to be stated, and I’m going to state it. I am my own editorial process - it boils down to the feeling in my gut. “Old school“ coverage never gave us a chance to ask questions and continue the dialogue. Never before was I given a chance to tell the world what I felt was important. Mind you, I’ve been publishing online since before the release of Windows 98! Moreover, not all members of the tech press are true geeks.

Did there evolve a certain spirit of publicly shared expertise among techie bloggers during that [beta] process…

There have been quite a few agreements and disagreements surrounding Vista. More than anything, the non-technical world simply wants to know if they should run out and get the new operating system ASAP (or just wait until it comes pre-installed on their next computer). I’m giving Vista a tentative “thumbs sideways“ - compared to my tentative “thumbs up“ for Windows XP, and a forceful “thumbs down“ for Windows Me. My unscientific hypothesis is that 50% of the tech world thinks we should skip Vista for now, and the other 50% think Vista is fine to use today.

What are your own feelings and impressions of the product in the different stages of beta versions you had in your hands…

Early on, I had extremely high hopes - and that enthusiasm faded into frustration with later builds. I couldn’t figure out why (and how) so many details were skipped in the polishing process. Mind you, I’m running Windows Vista on my desktop today - if only because I’ve got to get to know the product intimately if I’m to make recommendations for or against it.

And, of course, what are your impressions of the now-released product…

My impression of Windows Vista is generally lukewarm, given that many aspects of the OS and its apps seem unfinished, halfhearted. There are still quite a bit of software / hardware compatibility issues at play - too many. That said, I’m overly impressed with the way Vista handles drivers; in the time I’ve been working inside “gold“ code, I’ve had a few problems rectified through the new Windows Update process. Windows Vista is (off-the-shelf) overpriced, and I would encourage most users to wait until at least SP1 has been released before considering migrating an existing Windows install from XP to Vista.

By the way, I think I subscribed to your Lockergnome newsletter already in the late 90s or so, but somehow lost track of all the useful hints and tools that I simply hadn’t the time anymore to try out. But when I read ‘Lockergnome’ or ‘Chris Pirillo’ somewhere, it always reminds me of my Getting-Started-with-my-first-own-PC-during-University-time ages, almost 10 years ago.

My god, I’m getting to be an old geek.

Tags: vista, windows vista, windowsvista, party, microsoft

Vista FAQs

The purpose of these FAQs is to give you some answers to the questions that have been lingering around about the new operating system. They will provide you with some general information about Windows® Vista™. So, wonder no more, here come the answers!

Q: What is Windows Vista?

A: Windows Vista is Microsoft's next generation operating system, formerly known by its code name of "Longhorn." Originally announced in 2001 and officially unveiled at Microsoft's 2003 developers' conference, Vista faced numerous delays, with Microsoft scaling back some of its features, in order to help get it out the door within the stated target of 2006.

Windows Vista was released to business customers on November 30, 2006 and to everyone else today, January 30, 2007.

Q: What's with the name?

A: Microsoft had a list of names to choose from. While they will not say what the other choices were, they included everything from using simple numbers (Windows 2007) to letters (like Windows XP) and even more inventive names. Using a process of elimination, they finally decided to go with Vista. Microsoft's slogan for Windows Vista is "Bringing clarity to your world."

Q: So, what about security?

A: Windows Vista will deliver many new and improved security features. Some of these are:

User Account Control: (UAC, previously called both User Account Protection or UAP and Limited User Account to LUA). This gives users only the privileges they need to perform their tasks.

Windows Service Hardening: This monitors critical Windows services for abnormal activity in the file system, registry and network that could be used to allow malware to persist on a machine or propagate to other machines.

Microsoft Internet Explorer 7: This new Web browser in Windows Vista includes many features to help protect against malicious Web sites and malware and it includes protection against phishing and spoofing attacks.

Network Access Protection: Windows Vista has Network Access Protection to help prevent security compromised computers from connecting to a user's internal network until security criteria (such as the latest updates, security configuration settings or virus signatures downloaded) are met.

Firewall: Windows Vista provides outgoing, as well as, incoming filtering, which can be centrally managed via the Group Policy. This lets administrators control which applications are allowed to communicate or are blocked from communicating on the network.

Q: What are the system requirements to run Windows Vista?

A: Microsoft published two sets of system requirements for Vista. They are:

Windows Vista Capable PC:

- A modern processor (at least 800MHz)
- 512 MB of system memory
- A graphics processor that is DirectX 9 capable
- Windows Vista Premium Ready PC
- 1 GHz 32-bit (x86) or 64-bit (x64) processor
- 1 GB of system memory
- Support for DirectX 9 graphics with a WDDM driver, 128 MB of graphics memory (minimum), Pixel Shader 2.0 and 32 bits per pixel
- 40 GB of hard drive capacity with 15 GB free space
- DVD ROM Drive
- Audio output capability
- Internet access capability

My opinion: The "Windows Vista Premium Ready PC" requirements are close to the absolute real minimum requirements, except that the CPU requirements are too low. A real minimum would probably be around 2 GHz for a single-core processor, while a dual-core processor could possibly get away with 1.8 GHz.

Q: Will Windows Vista be a 32-bit or 64-bit operating system?

A: Windows Vista will be available in both 32-bit (x86) and 64-bit (x64) versions.

Q: Is there going to be a server version?

A: Yes. It is not yet known under which name this product will be released though. Right now, "Windows Server 2008" is a top runner in the speculation charts. Microsoft is targeting a 2007 release date for the server product, which is currently known by its code name of "Longhorn Server."

Q: What is WinFS?

A: WinFS (Windows Future Storage) is a database based storage engine, based on the SQL Server 2005. This new file system has some capabilities designed to improve searches for certain files on ever increasing storage media.

In late August 2004, Microsoft announced it would not include the WinFS data storage engine in Windows Vista, but would ship that technology in a beta form by the time Windows Vista will ship. It is still unclear if WinFS will actually show up any time soon though.

Q: Is Windows Vista more secure than Windows XP?

A: Yes. Not only does Windows Vista build on the security improvements made in Windows XP Service Pack 2 and Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1, but it has also added a number of fundamental changes to the security that should make Windows Vista as secure as can reasonably be expected. Like any other operating system, there probably will be security threads and the system will require security patches, but overall, Windows Vista should do a better job of protecting you and your computer's data.

So, how does all that sound? Not too shabby to me!

~ Ramachandran Kumaraswami

If you enjoy our tips, tell your friends. That's what keeps this newsletter growing.
http://www.worldstart.com/referafriend.htm

More Friday,
Chuckstr
----My Web Site----

Please feel free to forward this to anyone that you think might be interested in it.  If they wish to subscribe, they can click on the link below.

If this was forwarded to you and you wish to subscribe, please click here: Subscribe
If you wish to be deleted from the mailing list, please click here: Unsubscribe