|
Chuckstr's |
|
|
|
|
Hi Folks, Here are a couple of good tips form Lockergnome. DU Meter http://www.dumeter.com/ (Download)DU
Meter is a powerful and user-friendly tool that enables you to use your
Internet connection more efficiently. DU
Meter shows you how much of your full bandwidth potential is actually
utilized at any given point, either by displaying a real-time graph,
numerical display, or both. It works with dial-up, ISDN, DSL, cable
modems, and ethernet cards. DU Meter fits neatly on your browser toolbar,
preserving valuable desktop realestate, and uses minimal Windows resources
and memory. DU Meter is a standalone utility which involves no changes to
your Windows system files. The
current version includes full logging capabilities with export to many
different file formats, including Excel and HTML. It also has an auto hide
feature, monitoring of online hours with alerts, a fully customizable
interface, and a great stopwatch which helps you to accurately time your
downloads. DU Meter is fully compatible with Windows 95/98 and NT
4.0/2000/XP. Broken links in this article – see http://www.dumeter.com/ How Much RAM Do I Really Need? (Gnewbie
Gnook)08.25.2006 @ 12:45 PM PT | Ken Colburn | Comment | Send to Friends | Discuss Kristin asks: When
buying a new computer, how do I know how much RAM I should
buy? This
very important question has been at the foundation of the computer buying
process since the introduction of the personal
computer. The
fact that computers are now truly personal means that who you are and what
you use your computer for will be the ultimate determining factor on
answering this question. When
I got started in the business, deciding between 512K and 640K was the big
question. It then evolved to deciding between 640K and 1024K as operating
systems and programs were more able to make use of “extended
memory.“ As
of this writing, the decision points are 512 MB, 1 GB or 2 GB of RAM -
we’ve come a long way, baby! Before I go into further detail, let me pull out my classic
“computer kitchen“ analogy to help non-techies understand the major
components that determine performance in a
computer. In
the “computer kitchen,“ the processor (Intel or AMD) is like the chef. It
does all of the real work and
decision-making. RAM
is like a mixing bowl; it is a workspace that allows the chef to prepare
the meals. The
hard drive is like a refrigerator; it is designed to store things both
before and after they have been prepared. Just
about everything that you will be looking at will come with at least 512
MB of RAM (mixing bowl), so let’s consider this the entry
level. If
you will be performing simple tasks (such as writing letters, surfing the
Net or sending e-mails) and the only games that might be played on the
system are Solitaire and Tetris, then 512 MB of RAM is
adequate. If
you plan on doing these tasks simultaneously (often referred to as
multi-tasking - working on multiple courses in the computer kitchen at the
same time), then bumping the RAM (mixing bowl) up to 1 GB is likely to be
the most cost effective thing that you can do to improve the performance
of the system. In
fact, before I would recommend spending more money to slightly improve the
processor speed, I would strongly suggest you upgrade the RAM to 1
GB. A
slightly faster chef is of no use if his mixing bowl is too small for the
meals he wants to prepare. Conversely, a slightly slower chef with a
larger mixing bowl can output more food in a shorter period of time
because of the additional workspace. As a
normal course, Windows will use an open section of the hard drive (open
workspace in the refrigerator) when it runs out of RAM (mixing bowl space)
which significantly reduces the overall speed in which a task can be
accomplished, so when in doubt add more RAM (reduce the trips back and
forth to the refrigerator as much as
possible!). If
you are a real power user, such as a hard-core gamer or those dealing in
professional graphics or video, stepping up to 2 GB of RAM is in your best
interest, since you will be routinely preparing 7-course French meals in
your computer kitchen! CD Backups: Good Or Bad? (Gnewbie
Gnook)09.01.2006 @ 12:45 PM PT | Ken Colburn | Comment | Send to Friends | Discuss Fred
writes: I
have heard you say on your radio show that you don’t like CDs as a backup
system. Why is that? CDs
have had a dramatic impact on the computer world because of their enormous
storage capabilities at a relatively low cost. The problem with this great
technology is that too many folks think it’s an infallible technology that
can be abused and last a lifetime. While CDs are certainly more durable than traditional streaming
tape, they are quite sensitive to many factors that can ultimately
determine whether you will actually be able to read the data in the event
that you need it. I
don’t have a problem with folks that use CDs as a part of their data
backup strategy; I just don’t like it as the only ‘safety net’ for
critical data. We
routinely see folks in our data recovery lab with a pile of CDs that they
thought had their critical data stored, but for some reason they can’t
access the data on them. There are two distinct processes we need to cover; the first is a
single burn ‘archive’ (CD-R) that is intended to be a long-term storage
device (photos, videos, old financial records, etc.) and the second is the
repeated use of the same disk (CD-RW) for regular data
backups. For
single burn archives, it is critical that you use top quality name brand
media that actually incorporates some solid technology to manufacture the
disks (if you haven’t heard of the company, don’t buy it!). Elements such
as cheap dyes, shoddy adhesives, or little to no protective coatings over
the recording layer can have a dramatic impact on whether you will be able
to read the disk in future years. If
it’s critical data, always make two copies. Claims of 50 to 100 year life
spans have been made, but there are a whole host of things that can reduce
the actual life of the disks. Unlike stamped commercial disks, computer
burned disks are much more sensitive to light, heat, and
humidity. Keep
them out of direct sunlight, avoid wide temperature fluctuations and high
humidity, and remember to protect the label side of the CD. The back side
of the label is where the data is stored, so if the label gets scratched
off, your data is gone! Bending disks to remove them from their jewel cases can create tiny
cracks in the protective layer which over time allows oxidation of the
reflective material to occur (resulting in lost
data). If
you store your disks horizontally over a long period of time, warping can
occur depending upon what else is on top or below the disks, so always
store them vertically in their jewel cases. If
you place an adhesive label on the disk that has corrosive glue, it can
eat through the various layers, so make sure to use soft tip markers to
label the disks. When
it comes to re-writeable media (CD-RW), the quality of the disks is even
more important and cycling the media is critical. Always use multiple
disks and rotate them so you have some level of redundancy. After six
months of weekly use, replace with new media because re-writeable disks
can suffer from media fatigue if overused. Using CDs in combination with an external hard drive system backup
or an off-site Internet-based backup system is a much better strategy, so
that you are not betting on a single backup. (A free 30-day trial of the
Internet backup system we talked about on the radio is available at
DataDoctors.com.) By
using multiple backup procedures, you can dramatically reduce the
likelihood of ever needing expensive data recovery services. If you want
to see where the holes in your backup procedures are, review your disaster
recovery plan in the event of media failure, fire, flood, theft, and
employee sabotage. Visual Task Tips v2.0
(Download)09.20.2006 @ 12:48 PM PT | Mitch Keeler | Comment | Send to Friends | Discuss As
time passes, it seems like the public is becoming more and more unsure
about how good Windows Vista will be. If it does not live up to the hype,
how about we just rip some of the good things out of it and bring them to
Windows XP? I think that was the thought behind Visual Task
Tips. Visual
Task Tips is a lightweight shell enhancement utility. It provides
thumbnail preview image for each task in the Windows Taskbar, as seen in
the upcoming Microsoft Windows At
first, I didn’t think this would be that useful of a freeware program. I
was wrong. With just adding something as simple as thumbnail previews to
my taskbar I noticed I had become a little more productive. While I am
working here, I usually have several programs going at once. Visual Task
Tips allowed me to get a better handle on which one was
which. Visual Task Tips is totally free, pretty to look at, and makes you
more productive. The only thing more this program could do is print money!
Since I doubt that last feature will be built in to any freeware program
anytime soon, you’ll just have to live with the other excellent
features. [90K] [WinXP] [FREE] From the Sunday ads: Office Depot is having a 10-20% sale on all HPO printers. They have several good deals, noticably an all-in-one with FAX for $80. Have a good weekend folks. More Next Sunday, Please feel free to forward this to anyone that you think might be interested in it. If they wish to subscribe, they can click on the link below. If this was forwarded to you and you wish to subscribe,
please click here: Subscribe | |